<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome &#8211; Released, First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2008/09/google-chrome-released-first-impressions.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2008/09/google-chrome-released-first-impressions.html</link>
	<description>Bringing the Internet into Focus!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: media kingdof</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2008/09/google-chrome-released-first-impressions.html#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>media kingdof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lgr.ca/blog/?p=470#comment-807</guid>
		<description>should be interesting to see if Chrome works more efficiently than FireFox and IE... if it&#039;s faster than Firefox, since isn&#039;t IE, then i&#039;ll use it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should be interesting to see if Chrome works more efficiently than FireFox and IE&#8230; if it&#8217;s faster than Firefox, since isn&#8217;t IE, then i&#8217;ll use it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2008/09/google-chrome-released-first-impressions.html#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lgr.ca/blog/?p=470#comment-808</guid>
		<description>I’ve been quite impressed so far too - and like you it&#039;s mainly with the speed at which it starts up (definitely the quickest startup of a web browser I’ve seen, ok, it hasn’t got the features of Firefox yet, but still quicker than a clean install of Firefox, quicker than IE7 and Opera too) and the rendering.

I guess it will come into its own with more feature rich sites, such as GMail (which does seem very snappy).

So far, so good. Not sure I’ll be switching from FF3 just yet though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been quite impressed so far too &#8211; and like you it&#8217;s mainly with the speed at which it starts up (definitely the quickest startup of a web browser I’ve seen, ok, it hasn’t got the features of Firefox yet, but still quicker than a clean install of Firefox, quicker than IE7 and Opera too) and the rendering.</p>
<p>I guess it will come into its own with more feature rich sites, such as GMail (which does seem very snappy).</p>
<p>So far, so good. Not sure I’ll be switching from FF3 just yet though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/14 queries in 0.021 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 360/361 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.lgr.ca

Served from: www.lgr.ca @ 2012-02-11 16:01:26 -->
