<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google = Mafia?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/10/google-mafia.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/10/google-mafia.html</link>
	<description>Bringing the Internet into Focus!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/10/google-mafia.html#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/10/google-mafia.html#comment-255</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not defending Google...  just adding our observations from our research. I think the key is remembering that Google is not running a public service. It is simply a very large business that needs to show a profit, and its profits come from Adwords. They&#039;re under no obligation to include anyone&#039;s pages in their &quot;free&quot; search engine.

Perhaps more to the point. There&#039;s basically no such thing as a &quot;best result&quot; for a search, and indeed all of our research is telling us that Google is moving away from even trying to produce &quot;accurate&quot; results. It&#039;s been a long time since Google even allowed a proper Boolean search. With the introduction of Google Chrome and the statistics they have gathered from the pervasive use of Google Analytics we expect that they have already begun to bias results towards websites that have high Time on Site numbers.

Google&#039;s rationale is simple...  if people are spending a lot of time on the websites that Google ranks, they must be happy with the website, and that&#039;s a good enough result for Google&#039;s business model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not defending Google&#8230;  just adding our observations from our research. I think the key is remembering that Google is not running a public service. It is simply a very large business that needs to show a profit, and its profits come from Adwords. They&#8217;re under no obligation to include anyone&#8217;s pages in their &#8220;free&#8221; search engine.</p>
<p>Perhaps more to the point. There&#8217;s basically no such thing as a &#8220;best result&#8221; for a search, and indeed all of our research is telling us that Google is moving away from even trying to produce &#8220;accurate&#8221; results. It&#8217;s been a long time since Google even allowed a proper Boolean search. With the introduction of Google Chrome and the statistics they have gathered from the pervasive use of Google Analytics we expect that they have already begun to bias results towards websites that have high Time on Site numbers.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s rationale is simple&#8230;  if people are spending a lot of time on the websites that Google ranks, they must be happy with the website, and that&#8217;s a good enough result for Google&#8217;s business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Promotion is a Social Activity - LGR Webmaster Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/10/google-mafia.html#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Promotion is a Social Activity - LGR Webmaster Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 01:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/10/google-mafia.html#comment-254</guid>
		<description>[...] Google = Mafia? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google = Mafia? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LGR Webmaster Blog - Google Actually Posted Something OFFICIAL on Bought Links</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/10/google-mafia.html#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>LGR Webmaster Blog - Google Actually Posted Something OFFICIAL on Bought Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 04:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/10/google-mafia.html#comment-253</guid>
		<description>[...] Q: Is Google trying to tell webmasters how to run their own site? A: No. We&#8217;re giving advice to webmasters who want to do well in Google. Webmasters are welcome to make their sites however they like. We can run our protection racket business however we want. If you don&#8217;t want to play along you never know what might happen to your website in our index. Even if you are the most authoritative site for a topic, accidents happen and your website might just disappear. (Think mafia movie) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Q: Is Google trying to tell webmasters how to run their own site? A: No. We&#8217;re giving advice to webmasters who want to do well in Google. Webmasters are welcome to make their sites however they like. We can run our protection racket business however we want. If you don&#8217;t want to play along you never know what might happen to your website in our index. Even if you are the most authoritative site for a topic, accidents happen and your website might just disappear. (Think mafia movie) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/17 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 385/386 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.lgr.ca

Served from: www.lgr.ca @ 2012-02-10 10:47:27 -->
