<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8 Bits On Combining Typefaces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html</link>
	<description>Bringing the Internet into Focus!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:18:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: 14 Top Typeface and Font Combinations Resources &#124; BonFX - Logo Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>14 Top Typeface and Font Combinations Resources &#124; BonFX - Logo Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>[...] 8 Bits On Combining Typefaces Easy-reader with eight simple points. A great reminder is &#8220;you will almost never go wrong with combining practically any sans serif type with an opposite in style serif typeface&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 8 Bits On Combining Typefaces Easy-reader with eight simple points. A great reminder is &#8220;you will almost never go wrong with combining practically any sans serif type with an opposite in style serif typeface&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Wilkey</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Wilkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-133</guid>
		<description>GET THE TERMS RIGHT....

According to the textbooks I use as Assistant Professor of Graphic design there are some incorrect/incomplete typographic definitions listed above.

A font is a collection of all of the individual characters comprising a typeface (including uppercase and lowercase letters, numbers, punctuation, special characters, etc). Traditionally, one point size of a given font  would be considered a different font than would another point size, because it would have required a completely different set of letterpress for each size. However, with digital fonts, size is more a computational variable than a requirement for having of a different font file, so a change in size is not necessarily considered to be a change in font nowadays.

A typestyle is a variation of a font design within the same font family (i.e. Times Bold, Times Italic, etc)

The definition of a typeface above is adequate, however a more specific definition might refer to the design of the individual letterforms of a particular font giving that font/font family it&#039;s consistent, unique, and identifiable characteristics

A type/font family is a a number of fonts grouped together and relating by design. Each font within the same family relates to the other fonts of the same family but has variation(s) in type style (i.e. bold, italic, condensed, heavy, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GET THE TERMS RIGHT&#8230;.</p>
<p>According to the textbooks I use as Assistant Professor of Graphic design there are some incorrect/incomplete typographic definitions listed above.</p>
<p>A font is a collection of all of the individual characters comprising a typeface (including uppercase and lowercase letters, numbers, punctuation, special characters, etc). Traditionally, one point size of a given font  would be considered a different font than would another point size, because it would have required a completely different set of letterpress for each size. However, with digital fonts, size is more a computational variable than a requirement for having of a different font file, so a change in size is not necessarily considered to be a change in font nowadays.</p>
<p>A typestyle is a variation of a font design within the same font family (i.e. Times Bold, Times Italic, etc)</p>
<p>The definition of a typeface above is adequate, however a more specific definition might refer to the design of the individual letterforms of a particular font giving that font/font family it&#8217;s consistent, unique, and identifiable characteristics</p>
<p>A type/font family is a a number of fonts grouped together and relating by design. Each font within the same family relates to the other fonts of the same family but has variation(s) in type style (i.e. bold, italic, condensed, heavy, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOs And DON&#8217;Ts - Blog Feng Shui &#187; Inspiration Bit</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>DOs And DON&#8217;Ts - Blog Feng Shui &#187; Inspiration Bit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-132</guid>
		<description>[...] put more effort into understanding the principles of a good typography on Web. Be careful when combining typefaces on your blog. Cater your text size to users with different preferences, don&#8217;t limit them with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] put more effort into understanding the principles of a good typography on Web. Be careful when combining typefaces on your blog. Cater your text size to users with different preferences, don&#8217;t limit them with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Never really thought about this. Since there isn&#039;t really much of a selection of type fonts, I didn&#039;t think there would be a &quot;science&quot; about it.  I guess there is.  It will get a lot more complicating when they start adding more font in the standard.

~Douglas
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informativepost.com/2007/11/17/5-Lessons-Learned-By-a-Young-Webmaster-66.htm&quot;&gt;5 Lessons Learned By a Young Webmaster&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never really thought about this. Since there isn&#8217;t really much of a selection of type fonts, I didn&#8217;t think there would be a &#8220;science&#8221; about it.  I guess there is.  It will get a lot more complicating when they start adding more font in the standard.</p>
<p>~Douglas<br />
<a href="http://www.informativepost.com/2007/11/17/5-Lessons-Learned-By-a-Young-Webmaster-66.htm">5 Lessons Learned By a Young Webmaster</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nachlese Juli 2007- Die Seiten des Monats &#124; Nachlese &#124; Dr. Web Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Nachlese Juli 2007- Die Seiten des Monats &#124; Nachlese &#124; Dr. Web Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-130</guid>
		<description>[...] 8 Bits On Combining Typefaces 8 Ratschläge zur Auswahl von passenden und &quot;funktionierenden&quot; Schriftarten. Klassik, aber schön zu wissen: um einen typografischen Kontrast zu erzeugen, genügt es häufig einen Serifenschnitt zusammen mit einer serifenlosen Schriftart einzusetzen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 8 Bits On Combining Typefaces 8 Ratschläge zur Auswahl von passenden und &quot;funktionierenden&quot; Schriftarten. Klassik, aber schön zu wissen: um einen typografischen Kontrast zu erzeugen, genügt es häufig einen Serifenschnitt zusammen mit einer serifenlosen Schriftart einzusetzen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of July 2007 &#124; Best of the Month</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of July 2007 &#124; Best of the Month</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] 8 Bits On Combining Typefaces With so many typefaces available it can be a daunting task to pick and combine the right typefaces for the task. I&#8217;ll try breaking the selection strategies into 8 bits to help you with achieving the most effective type combinations. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 8 Bits On Combining Typefaces With so many typefaces available it can be a daunting task to pick and combine the right typefaces for the task. I&#8217;ll try breaking the selection strategies into 8 bits to help you with achieving the most effective type combinations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-128</guid>
		<description>some nice observations here,&lt;br/&gt;I am however dissapointed with the treatment of typography as a dirty chore...&lt;br/&gt;Some of us really really enjoy it and find it extremely engaging</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some nice observations here,<br />I am however dissapointed with the treatment of typography as a dirty chore&#8230;<br />Some of us really really enjoy it and find it extremely engaging</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LGR</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>LGR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by as well Wizzer. I Stumbled your blog, but enjoyed your post on Squidoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by as well Wizzer. I Stumbled your blog, but enjoyed your post on Squidoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wizzer</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Wizzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/06/8-bits-on-combining-typefaces.html#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by my blog:&lt;br/&gt;http://www.6m-profitmethod.com/business-success&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Glad you did - I found your post about fonts really interesting - have to say it&#039;s something I&#039;d never really thought much about before.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m in two minds about text size on blogs - too large and the page looks out of balance yet too small and it&#039;s hard to read. With some fonts I just can&#039;t seem to get it right - trial &amp; error stuff I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by my blog:<br /><a href="http://www.6m-profitmethod.com/business-success">http://www.6m-profitmethod.com/business-success</a></p>
<p>Glad you did &#8211; I found your post about fonts really interesting &#8211; have to say it&#8217;s something I&#8217;d never really thought much about before.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in two minds about text size on blogs &#8211; too large and the page looks out of balance yet too small and it&#8217;s hard to read. With some fonts I just can&#8217;t seem to get it right &#8211; trial &#038; error stuff I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
