<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .html Versus .php for SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/02/html-versus-php-for-seo.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/02/html-versus-php-for-seo.html</link>
	<description>Bringing the Internet into Focus!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: LGR</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/02/html-versus-php-for-seo.html#comment-17343</link>
		<dc:creator>LGR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/02/html-versus-php-for-seo.html#comment-17343</guid>
		<description>You can still use .html even if the site is run in PHP. For example this site is run with WordPress but most of the posts use .html in the permalink. I did not do it for SEO but it was just easier since I moved the site from a Blogger blog at one time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can still use .html even if the site is run in PHP. For example this site is run with WordPress but most of the posts use .html in the permalink. I did not do it for SEO but it was just easier since I moved the site from a Blogger blog at one time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Walls</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/02/html-versus-php-for-seo.html#comment-17330</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Walls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/02/html-versus-php-for-seo.html#comment-17330</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post! I still personally believe that .html is the best for SEO. A new website I am bulding requires a database it is nice to read that using .php won&#039;t affect SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post! I still personally believe that .html is the best for SEO. A new website I am bulding requires a database it is nice to read that using .php won&#8217;t affect SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lino Almojuela</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/02/html-versus-php-for-seo.html#comment-3511</link>
		<dc:creator>Lino Almojuela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 04:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/02/html-versus-php-for-seo.html#comment-3511</guid>
		<description>Ive been looking around looking for an answer which is better extension for SEO specially Google and I found your answer really helpful. Thank you very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive been looking around looking for an answer which is better extension for SEO specially Google and I found your answer really helpful. Thank you very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LGR</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/02/html-versus-php-for-seo.html#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>LGR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/02/html-versus-php-for-seo.html#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Your welcome Alicia. I am glad you found it useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your welcome Alicia. I am glad you found it useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alicia</title>
		<link>http://www.lgr.ca/blog/2007/02/html-versus-php-for-seo.html#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Alicia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blog2.lgr.ca/2007/02/html-versus-php-for-seo.html#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Thanks, this is the answer to my question. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Alicia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, this is the answer to my question. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.</p>
<p>Alicia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/26 queries in 0.038 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 427/443 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.lgr.ca

Served from: www.lgr.ca @ 2012-02-11 14:03:22 -->
